ZH
Back to work

Field Services · Lead Automation + AI Agent Build

Summit Services Group

Close rate (up from 12%)

Tripled close rate in 30 days by eliminating a 6–8 hour lead response gap with a 5-minute automated follow-up system

Duration30 days
Year2024
IndustryField Services

The short answer

Summit Services Group was generating leads but losing them before anyone picked up the phone. A 6–8 hour average response time meant prospects had already booked competitors by the time someone called back. I built an automated system that texted every new lead within 5 minutes and booked them directly into the team's calendar. Close rate went from 12% to 34% in the first month. The engagement paid for itself in week two.


Problem

The leads weren't the problem. The pipeline was.

Summit was running a functional ad program — forms were filling, phones were ringing. But Marcus and his operations team were manually sorting every form submission, triaging by location and service type, and then calling back when they got to it. In a service business, "when we get to it" is a death sentence for lead quality.

The average time between form submission and first contact was 6–8 hours. Industry research puts the contact rate at 10x higher when you respond within 5 minutes versus 10 minutes. At 6–8 hours, most of those leads had already committed to a competitor.

The close rate reflected it: 12%.


Approach

Audit the follow-up gap first. Before touching a single ad, I mapped the full lead journey from form submission to first contact. The bottleneck was obvious within a day — no automation, no routing logic, no urgency built into the process. The ads were fine. The back-end was broken.

Build a 5-minute SMS trigger. I connected Summit's contact form to a workflow that fires an automated text message within 5 minutes of every submission. The message came from a real number associated with the business, used the prospect's first name, and included a direct calendar link for same-day or next-day booking. It read like it came from a person — because in every way that matters, it did.

Automated routing by service type. Different services have different urgency levels and different team members. I built routing logic that tagged each lead by service type and assigned it to the right person automatically, eliminating the manual triage step that was adding hours to the response time.

Calendar integration. Prospects who clicked the booking link landed directly in the team's scheduling system — no back-and-forth, no phone tag. They picked a time, confirmed the appointment, and got an automated reminder 24 hours out.


Result

BeforeAfter (Month 1)
6–8 hr avg response time< 5 min response time
12% close rate34% close rate
Manual lead triageAutomated routing by service type
No follow-up systemSMS + calendar booking, same day

The close rate nearly tripled. Marcus's words: "The automation alone paid for the engagement in week two."

No ad spend was changed. No landing pages were rebuilt. The only thing that moved was speed-to-follow-up — and it changed the trajectory of the business.


What I'd do differently

Add a second automated touchpoint at the 24-hour mark for leads that clicked the calendar link but didn't book. A significant percentage of interested prospects go cold not because they chose someone else, but because they got busy and forgot. One follow-up text the next morning recovers a meaningful share of those.


This Is What “Being the Answer” Looks Like.

The Found First methodology — the system I built to run AI search visibility at enterprise scale — is what produced this outcome. Every engagement starts with an audit so I can show you what's recoverable, what's fixable, and what the install would look like for your business.